Yana Skakun
Yana Skakun
It is a conversation I end up having with almost every couple at some point during the run-up to their wedding, usually somewhere between the final dress fitting and the seating plan — not about the day itself, but about what comes after it. Increasingly, the couples I photograph are vegan, vegetarian, or simply trying to live in a way that sits more lightly on the planet, and that same thinking is starting to shape how they plan their honeymoon. It is a shift I find genuinely encouraging. A honeymoon does not have to mean a long-haul flight, an all-inclusive resort with imported produce flown in daily, and a fortnight spent slightly disconnected from the place you are actually visiting. It can mean something slower, more considered, and more memorable — and, as it happens, those trips tend to produce far better photographs too. This guide draws together what I have learned from couples who have done exactly this, along with some practical thinking on how to plan a honeymoon from the UK that is kinder to the environment and easy to navigate as a vegan or plant-based traveller, without sacrificing the sense of occasion a honeymoon deserves.
The phrase gets used loosely, so it is worth being specific. For most couples I speak to, an eco-friendly honeymoon rests on a handful of practical decisions rather than one grand gesture: choosing a destination that does not require multiple connecting flights, staying somewhere with a genuine and verifiable commitment to sustainability rather than a green-sounding marketing page, favouring slower forms of transport once you arrive, eating food that has not travelled further than you have, and being mindful of water and energy use in places where those resources are genuinely scarce. None of this requires martyrdom. It simply means building your itinerary around a slightly different set of priorities than the ones a glossy honeymoon brochure tends to lead with.
The single biggest lever, by a wide margin, is the flight itself. Long-haul travel dominates the carbon footprint of almost any holiday, so the most meaningful decision most couples can make is not about which eco-lodge to book but about how far they fly and how many separate flights it takes to get there. This does not mean ruling out long-haul honeymoons altogether — plenty of couples still choose them and that is a perfectly reasonable choice to make with open eyes — but it does mean it is worth genuinely weighing a direct long-haul flight against several short-haul hops, or against a closer destination reached by train and ferry, before assuming the far-flung option is the only honeymoon worth having.
Europe offers a genuinely enormous range of honeymoon experiences reachable without a long-haul flight, and several countries have built strong reputations for sustainable tourism infrastructure that also happens to make vegan travel easy. Slovenia is a favourite I hear about often — Ljubljana has a thriving plant-based food scene, the country has invested seriously in green tourism certification for its hotels and guesthouses, and the landscape of lakes, forests, and mountains gives a honeymoon a real sense of place without requiring a car for every excursion. Portugal, reachable by direct flight in a little over two hours from most UK airports, pairs a strong vegan restaurant culture in cities like Lisbon and Porto with train travel that makes it easy to see several regions without hiring a car.
Closer still, and increasingly popular with couples who want to minimise flying altogether, is the option of reaching a destination by train and ferry rather than by air. The Eurostar connects into a European rail network that can take you into France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and onward into Germany, Switzerland, or Italy without a single flight. It takes longer, certainly, but a honeymoon is one of the few holidays in life where the journey itself is allowed to be part of the experience rather than a hurdle to get through as quickly as possible. Scotland and the west of Ireland are also worth genuine consideration — both offer dramatic, quiet landscapes, a growing number of small sustainably-run guesthouses, and the kind of slow, unhurried pace that a honeymoon is meant to have, all reachable without flying at all.
If a longer-haul trip is what you have your heart set on, it is worth choosing a single primary destination and staying there for the bulk of the trip rather than island-hopping or stringing together several internal flights. One long flight followed by ground or sea transport for the remainder of the trip has a meaningfully smaller footprint than the same total distance broken into several shorter flights, and it also tends to produce a calmer, less exhausting honeymoon.
This is the area where it is easiest to be misled, because almost every hotel website now uses the language of sustainability somewhere on its homepage. The distinction worth learning to spot is between a property that has made structural changes — renewable energy, water recycling, genuine local sourcing, waste reduction that goes beyond asking guests to reuse towels — and one that has simply adopted the vocabulary. Independent certification schemes are the most reliable signal. Look for accommodation that holds a recognised sustainable tourism certification rather than one that simply describes itself as eco-friendly in its own marketing copy, and read a little further than the homepage to see whether the claims are backed up with specifics.
Smaller, independently run properties tend to have a real edge here over large international chains, partly because sustainability decisions at that scale are made by the people who actually own and run the place rather than filtered through corporate policy. A family-run guesthouse that grows some of its own produce, sources the rest from within the region, and has thought carefully about its water and energy use will often have a genuinely lower footprint than a large resort with a sustainability page, even if the resort has more certificates on display. It is also worth asking directly, before booking, how the property handles vegan catering — a good answer usually comes quickly and with genuine enthusiasm rather than a vague assurance that something can probably be arranged.
Farm stays, eco-lodges, and small countryside hotels with kitchen gardens are worth seeking out specifically if plant-based eating matters to you, because a property that already grows and cooks seasonally is one that will handle a vegan request as a normal part of its existing menu rather than as an awkward exception requiring a special trip to the supermarket.
Planning the wedding and the honeymoon together
If sustainability and thoughtful, values-led planning matter to you for your honeymoon, the same thinking is usually worth carrying into the wedding day itself. I love working with couples who want their day to feel considered rather than default.
Get in touch to talk through your dayA vegan honeymoon used to mean a certain amount of advance research and a slightly resigned attitude to eating the same safe dish in every restaurant. That has changed enormously in the last several years, and in most of Europe in particular it is now genuinely easy to eat extremely well as a vegan traveller, provided you choose destinations and accommodation with that in mind. Cities with a strong café and small-restaurant culture — Lisbon, Ljubljana, Berlin, and increasingly most larger European cities — now have enough dedicated plant-based restaurants that you can eat well without relying on your hotel at all.
In more rural areas, the picture is a little more mixed, which is where accommodation choice becomes doubly important. A guesthouse or small hotel that already cooks with local, seasonal produce is far more likely to put together a genuinely good vegan meal than a restaurant working from a fixed printed menu with no flexibility. It is worth emailing ahead of a stay in a smaller or more remote location simply to confirm that vegan catering is genuinely available rather than assuming it, particularly if you are planning to eat most meals at the property itself.
Markets are also worth building into the itinerary wherever you can. Buying fruit, bread, and other simple provisions from a local market not only guarantees a vegan-friendly lunch but tends to be one of the more memorable, unhurried parts of any trip — and it keeps your spending directly with local producers rather than with an imported supply chain, which is itself part of what makes a trip lower impact.
How you move around a destination matters almost as much as how you got there. Trains, in most of Europe, are comfortable, scenic, and often considerably more enjoyable than the equivalent car journey, and a honeymoon built around a rail pass rather than a hire car tends to force a slower, more present pace that suits the occasion. Where a car is genuinely necessary — more remote or rural destinations, particularly in Scotland, Ireland, or the more mountainous parts of Europe — hiring the smallest practical vehicle and planning a route that minimises unnecessary backtracking makes a meaningful difference.
Walking and cycling are worth building into the itinerary as well, not purely for environmental reasons but because they tend to produce the most memorable parts of any trip. Some of the loveliest honeymoon accounts I hear afterwards involve an afternoon spent walking between two villages, or a day hiring bicycles to explore somewhere that would have been seen only from a car window otherwise. It slows the trip down in exactly the way a honeymoon benefits from being slowed down.
None of the small, practical habits that reduce a trip's footprint require any sacrifice of comfort. A refillable water bottle and a lightweight set of reusable cutlery take up almost no space in a suitcase and remove the need for a steady stream of single-use plastic across a fortnight away. Reef-safe sun cream matters enormously if any part of the trip involves swimming near coral or in protected marine areas, since conventional sun cream chemicals are genuinely damaging to marine ecosystems in the quantities that tourism now produces. Packing light in general reduces the fuel cost of every flight and transfer, and it is also, frankly, just a nicer way to travel.
It is worth thinking, too, about how you spend money once you are there. Choosing locally owned restaurants, guides, and shops over large international chains keeps your spending within the community you are visiting, which is one of the more meaningful and immediate forms of positive impact a traveller can have. Community-led tours, in particular, tend to be more interesting than the generic version offered by a large operator, and the money stays local rather than flowing back to a head office elsewhere.
Carbon offsetting schemes are worth mentioning briefly because they come up so often in this conversation, and it is worth being honest about their limits. Offsetting a flight through a reputable, verified scheme is better than doing nothing, but it should be thought of as a small mitigation rather than a solution that cancels out the impact of the travel itself. The more meaningful choices are the ones made earlier in the planning process — destination, distance, number of flights, accommodation, and how you move around once you arrive. If you do choose to offset, look for schemes independently verified against a recognised standard rather than one bundled in cheaply at the checkout of a flight booking, since the quality and genuine impact of these schemes varies enormously.
A honeymoon planned this way tends to end up being not just lower impact but genuinely more memorable — slower, more rooted in the place you have chosen, and full of the kind of unhurried, specific moments that make for the best stories when you are home. It also, as a photographer who has heard a great many honeymoon accounts over the years, tends to produce the best photographs: a market stall rather than a buffet, a train window rather than an airport lounge, a walk between two villages rather than a transfer coach. If you are planning your wedding and want your day, and everything that follows it, to feel like a genuine reflection of how you want to live, get in touch and we can talk through how to make the whole occasion feel like yours from the ceremony to the send-off.

Yana Skakun
Photographer · England
Professional wedding, family and portrait photographer based in England. Passionate about capturing authentic emotions and timeless moments.
About Yana →Yana Skakun is a professional wedding photographer based in Cambridge, covering weddings across England — from intimate elopements to full-day ceremonies at country houses, barns, and city venues. Every couple receives a relaxed, documentary approach that captures the day as it truly unfolds. This guide — A Guide to Eco-Friendly and Vegan Honeymoons from the UK — is part of the photography journal: practical, experience-based advice drawn from real sessions across England. Whether you arrived searching for eco friendly honeymoon ideas or vegan honeymoon destinations, the same care and attention shapes every session Yana photographs.
Wedding Photography sessions are available year-round, with bookings open across Cambridge, Ely, Huntingdon, Peterborough, and further afield — East England, London, the Midlands, and beyond. If you have specific questions about sustainable travel uk, mention it in your enquiry. Get in touch through the contact form above to check availability and discuss your session. Enquiries are welcomed from anywhere in the UK.
Wedding photography in England typically ranges from £1,500 to £4,000+ for a full day. Price depends on experience, coverage hours, and whether albums or engagement shoots are included. Most photographers charge between £2,000–£3,000 for 8–10 hours of coverage.
For peak season (May–September), book 12–18 months in advance. For autumn and winter weddings, 9–12 months is usually sufficient. Popular photographers at popular venues fill up fast — as soon as you have a date and venue confirmed, start reaching out.
Most professional wedding photographers deliver 400–800 edited images for a full-day wedding. The exact number depends on coverage hours, how many guests there are, and the photographer's editing style. Quality matters more than quantity — a curated gallery of 500 images tells the story better than 1,500 unedited files.
A second photographer is helpful if you want simultaneous coverage of getting-ready moments in different locations, multiple angles during the ceremony, or more candid coverage during the reception. It adds cost but significantly increases the variety and completeness of your gallery.
Documentary (reportage) wedding photography captures moments as they happen — the photographer observes and doesn't intervene. Editorial photography involves deliberate direction: placing you in good light, shaping compositions, creating intentional portraits. Most photographers blend both styles throughout the day.
Continue Reading

Wedding Tips
15 min read · Read Article

Wedding Tips
14 min read · Read Article

Wedding Tips
15 min read · Read Article
Get in Touch
Get in touch to discuss your vision — I'll reply within 24 hours.